Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Training requirements for DXA technologists in the United States

  • Laura D. Carbone(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Karen D. Barrow
    ,
  • Julie Vannerson
    ,
  • David Boatright
    ,
  • Catherine Womack
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine, by state, the requirements for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) operators' training, knowledge of these state requirements, and factors that predicted state and International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) certification of DXA technologists. Seventeen states required registered technologist (RT) certification or authorized/licensed limited certification for DXA operators, 16 had no certification requirements, 12 required RT certification, and 5 had state-specific requirements. There were 9745 surveys mailed to DXA users including 50% Hologic Inc., 50% GE Lunar, and 100% Norland; 3148 surveys are included in this analysis. Among responders who indicated that their state did not have any certification requirements (n = 1673), 1095 (65.5%) were incorrect; there were requirements. Possession of state and ISCD certification was significantly correlated with the number of patients scanned per week (p ≤ 0.05), the number of technologists employed within a center (p < 0.01), and the subspecialty of the practitioner (p ≤ 0.02). Our study uncovered a lack of uniformity among states with respect to central DXA operator training requirements. Additionally, in those states with requirements, DXA operators were often unaware of these requirements. Uniform national training requirements for central DXA operators to ensure adequate DXA scan quality are urgently needed.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 251-260 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical Densitometry (Volume 8, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2005

Publication status

Published - 2005

ISSN

1094-6950

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 23444451600
  • PubMed: 16055953

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.13
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
1
SciVal
Paper percentile
35
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
1
Captures
6

Funding Details

We would like to thank Drs. AA Khan, Niti Goel and Richard Eastell; Marty Rotblatt (ISCD); GE Lunar, Hologic Inc., and Norland, a Cooper Surgical Company for their help in this project. We would also like to thank the secretarial staff of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Department of Medicine who assisted with the mass mailings. This work was supported by grants from the ISCD and the Alliance for Better Bone Health.
FunderFunding numbers
ISCD
-