Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on pap smear reports: Management by repeat pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?

  • Daron G. Ferris(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Thomas C. Wright
    ,
  • Mark S. Litaker
    ,
  • Ralph M. Richart
    ,
  • Attila T. Lorincz
    ,
  • Xiao Wei Sun
*Corresponding author for this work
  • ,
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
    ,
  • Medical College of Georgia
    ,
  • Digene Corporation
    ,
  • Planned Parenthood of Westchester and Rockland, Inc.
    ,
  • University of Kansas
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a repeat Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and the Hybrid Capture tube-based (HCT) HPV DNA test for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or 3 in women with recent atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Pap smear reports. METHODS. Women with a recent Pap smear report of ASCUS (n=169) or LSIL (n=110) had a repeat Pap smear, sampling of the cervix for HCT HPV DNA assay and a colposcopy examination. Data were evaluated using three different triage thresholds for colposcopy examination: a repeat Pap smear of persistent ASCUS or more severe dysplasia, a finding of persistent LSIL or more severe dysplasia, and a carcinogenic HPV test result. RESULTS. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting CiN 2/3 were 70%, 45%, 7%, end 96% for a repeat Pap smear using an ASCUS-positive threshold and 20%, 86%, 8%, and 94% for a repeat Pap smear using an LSIL-positive threshold, respectively, when women with an initial ASCUS Pap smear were considered. HPV testing for carcinogenic viruses alone or in combination with a repeat Pap smear (using ASCUS as a positive threshold) yielded results of 50%, 67%, 9%, and 96%, respectively, and 70%, 37%, 7%, and 95%, respectively, for detecting CIN 2/3. In women with an initial LSIL Pap smear, respective values for detecting CIN 2/3 by a repeat Pap smear with an ASCUS threshold were 92%, 26%, 14%, and 96%, and for an LSIL threshold 23%, 64%, 8%, and 86%, respectively. Hybrid Capture HPV testing alone or in combination with a repeat Pap smear yielded 69%, 43%, 14%, end 91%, respectively, and 100%, 21%, 14%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. A Pap smear triage threshold restricted to LSIL or more severe dysplasia for women with prior ASCUS or LSIL Pap smear results was clearly ineffective for detecting high-grade cervical precancerous lesions. In contrast, when the repeat Pap smear triage threshold was expanded to include persistent ASCUS as abnormal, 83% of the women with CIN 2/3 were detected. Detection of carcinogenic HPV DNA using the HCT test was almost as sensitive for detecting CIN 2/3 as a solitary repeat Pap smear using an ASCUS or more severe positive threshold. Combining the HPV test with a repeat Pap smear did not significantly improve the sensitivity of cytology for detecting high- grade CIN. This study suggests that women with ASCUS and particularly LSIL Pap smears should be referred for a colposcopy examination until better triage methods become available.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 125-134 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Family Practice (Volume 46, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/1998

Publication status

Published - 02/1998

ISSN

0094-3509

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0031952387
  • PubMed: 9487318

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.10
Fractional count
9
Fractional count
0.90
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
citations
93
SciVal
FWCI
14.86
SciVal
Author count
10
SciVal
Paper percentile
93
SciVal
Top percentile
10

PlumX

Captures
41
Social media
16
Citation count
96