Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Trunk and hip muscle activation during yoga poses: Implications for physical therapy practice

  • Debra Beazley
    ,
  • Shilpa Patel
    ,
  • Brent Davis
    ,
  • Steven Vinson
    ,
  • Lori Bolgla(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Objective To determine and compare activation of core muscles during yoga to traditional back exercises. Methods Surface electromyography was used to quantify activation of the rectus abdominis (RA), abdominal obliques (AO), lumbar extensors (LE), and gluteus maximus (GMX) during four yoga poses. Data were expressed as 100% of a maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Separate analyses of variance with repeated measures were used to compare muscle activity across each exercise. Results Subjects generated greater RA (P < 0.0001) and AO (P < 0.0001) activity during the Plank. They generated greater AO activity (P < 0.0001) during the Upward-Facing Dog than the Chair and Dominant-Side Warrior 1. LE activity was greatest (P < 0.0001) during the Chair. GMX activity was similar (P = 0.09) during all exercises. Conclusion Yoga poses may help improve core endurance and strength. Clinicians may use these data when developing and implementing an evidence-based core exercise program for individuals who prefer a yoga treatment strategy.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 130-135 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (Volume 29)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/2017

Publication status

Published - 11/2017

ISSN

1744-3881

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85029476573
  • PubMed: 29122250
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-4298-4779/work/50640021

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.11
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
citations
7
SciVal
Paper percentile
68
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.40
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.60
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
93
Citation count
23