Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Unevenness of the Apical Constriction in Human Maxillary Central Incisors

  • David G. Olson(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Steven Roberts
    ,
  • Anthony P. Joyce
    ,
  • D. Edward Collins
    ,
  • James C. McPherson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Endodontic Residency Program
    ,
  • ,
  • College of Dental Medicine
    ,
  • U.S. Army Department of Clinical Investigations
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

This study examined the incisoapical extent of the apical constriction in 45 human maxillary central incisors. The null hypothesis was that the apical constriction is a flat ring. Our working hypothesis was that the constriction is actually uneven or "skewed" as it traces a path around the circumference of the canal. Teeth were split and imaged with 25× magnification, and the most apical and coronal limits of the apical constriction were identified and measured. Analysis of the data indicates that a majority (>70%) of maxillary central incisors exhibit an unevenness or "skew" of the apical constriction of greater than 100 μm in the incisoapical dimension, with a maximum measured skew of 385 μm. On the basis of the results of this study, a statistically significant (P < .05) variation in the longitudinal position of the apical constriction around its circumference was confirmed in maxillary central incisors.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 157-159 (3 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of endodontics (Volume 34, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2008

Publication status

Published - 02/2008

ISSN

0099-2399

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 38149116166
  • PubMed: 18215672

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
13
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.80
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
66

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
19
Captures
47