Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Users' guides to the medical literature XXII: How to use articles about clinical decision rules

  • T. G. McGinn(corresponding author)
    ,
  • G. H. Guyatt
    ,
  • P. C. Wyer
    ,
  • C. D. Naylor
    ,
  • I. G. Stiell
    ,
  • W. S. Richardson
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Abstract

Clinical experience provides clinicians with an intuitive sense of which findings on history, physical examination, and investigation are critical in making an accurate diagnosis, or an accurate assessment of a patient's fate. A clinical decision rule (CDR) is a clinical tool that quantifies the individual contributions that various components of the history, physical examination, and basic laboratory results make toward the diagnosis, prognosis, or likely response to treatment in a patient. Clinical decision, rules attempt to formally test, simplify, and increase the accuracy of clinicians' diagnostic and prognostic assessments. Existing CDRs guide clinicians, establish pretest probability, provide screening tests for common problems, and estimate risk. Three steps are involved in the development and testing of a CDR: creation of the rule, testing or validating the rule, and assessing the impact of the rule on clinical behavior. Clinicians evaluating CDRs for possible clinical use should assess the following components: the method of derivation; the validation of the CDR to ensure that its repeated use leads to the same results; and its predictive power. We consider CDRs that have been validated in a new clinical setting to be level 1 CDRs and most appropriate for implementation. Level 1 CDRs have the potential to inform clinical judgment, to change clinical behavior, and to reduce unnecessary costs, while maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 79-84 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the American Medical Association (Volume 284, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/05/2000

Publication status

Published - 07/05/2000

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0034608969
  • PubMed: 10872017

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
743
SciVal
FWCI
18.08
SciVal
Author count
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.17
Fractional count
5
Fractional count
0.83
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
899
Mentions
2
Captures
538