Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Vascular access as a determinant of adequacy of dialysis

  • Andrew J. Cortez
    ,
  • William D. Paulson
    ,
  • Steve J. Schwab(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Vascular accesses consist of permanent arteriovenous (AV) accesses (autogenous fistulas and synthetic grafts) and venous accesses (central venous catheters [CVCs]). AV accesses have fewer complications than venous accesses, and are therefore the preferred hemodialysis access. An important additional issue is whether the type of access influences adequacy of dialysis (i.e. Kt/V). Key limiting factors in delivering adequate Kt/V are blood pump speed (Q B), access recirculation, and treatment time. In general, AV accesses support higher QBs with less negative inflow arterial pressures than CVCs. Well-functioning AV accesses are also less likely to exhibit recirculation. Nevertheless, recirculation commonly develops when AV accesses (usually grafts) develop stenosis with decreased access blood flow. Although extension of treatment time can offset the effects of reduced QB and recirculation, this is often impractical and poorly accepted by patients. In conclusion, AV accesses are superior to venous accesses because they are less prone to complications and are more likely to deliver prescribed Kt/V within prescribed treatment time.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 96-101 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Seminars in Nephrology (Volume 25, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2005

Publication status

Published - 03/2005

ISSN

0270-9295

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 15744373649
  • PubMed: 15791561

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
16
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.53
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
69

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
26
Captures
20