Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Warfarin and aspirin in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm

  • Shunichi Homma(corresponding author)
    ,
  • John L.P. Thompson
    ,
  • Patrick M. Pullicino
    ,
  • Bruce Levin
    ,
  • Ronald S. Freudenberger
    ,
  • John R. Teerlink
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Columbia University
    ,
  • University of Kent
    ,
  • Lehigh Valley Hospital
    ,
  • University of California at San Francisco
    ,
  • VA Medical Center
    ,
  • SUNY Buffalo
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether warfarin or aspirin therapy is superior for patients with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm. METHODS: We designed this trial to determine whether warfarin (with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.5) or aspirin (at a dose of 325 mg per day) is a better treatment for patients in sinus rhythm who have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We followed 2305 patients for up to 6 years (mean [±SD], 3.5±1.8). The primary outcome was the time to the first event in a composite end point of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or death from any cause. RESULTS: The rates of the primary outcome were 7.47 events per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group and 7.93 in the aspirin group (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.10; P = 0.40). Thus, there was no significant overall difference between the two treatments. In a time-varying analysis, the hazard ratio changed over time, slightly favoring warfarin over aspirin by the fourth year of follow-up, but this finding was only marginally significant (P = 0.046). Warfarin, as compared with aspirin, was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of ischemic stroke throughout the follow-up period (0.72 events per 100 patient-years vs. 1.36 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82; P = 0.005). The rate of major hemorrhage was 1.78 events per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group as compared with 0.87 in the aspirin group (P<0.001). The rates of intracerebral and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (0.27 events per 100 patient-years with warfarin and 0.22 with aspirin, P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with reduced LVEF who were in sinus rhythm, there was no significant overall difference in the primary outcome between treatment with warfarin and treatment with aspirin. A reduced risk of ischemic stroke with warfarin was offset by an increased risk of major hemorrhage. The choice between warfarin and aspirin should be individualized. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; WARCEF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00041938.)

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1859-1869 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

New England Journal of Medicine (Volume 366, Issue 20)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/17/2012

Publication status

Published - 05/17/2012

ISSN

0028-4793

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84861037910
  • PubMed: 22551105

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
370
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
37.10
SciVal
Author count
535
SciVal
Paper percentile
99
SciVal
Top percentile
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.00
Fractional count
534
Fractional count
1.00
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
5
Usage
36
Captures
480
Citation count
556
Social media
101