Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

When everything is too much. Quantitative approaches to the issue of futility.: Quantitative Approaches to the Issue of Futility

  • Mark H. Ebell(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Although physicians agree broadly that there is no obligation to provide futile care, there is no consensus, of which I am aware, regarding a definition of futility. Two quantitative approaches to determining futility are proposed, neither of which involves financial costs. First, based on the number of consecutive failures of an intervention, it is possible to calculate the probability of success for the next attempted treatment. The second method uses quality-adjusted life years to balance the burden and benefit of a specific treatment and to determine the probability of success beneath which the treatment is futile. When applied to the use of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with metastatic cancer, both of these methods confirm the futility of this intervention.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 352-356 (5 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Archives of Family Medicine (Volume 4, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/01/1995

Publication status

Published - 04/01/1995

ISSN

1063-3987

Publication IDs

  • PubMed: 7711923
  • Scopus: 85047692282

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
13
Citation count
9