Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling: How Gender Shapes Affective Polarization

*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Abstract

We examine variation in levels of affective polarization for men and women. Using the 1980 to 2016 American National Election Studies, we find that women are more affectively polarized than men. The effect of sex partially works indirectly through political identities and issue positions. Moreover, sex acts as a moderator, with political identities and issues positions have different effects on men’s and women’s level of affective polarization. Three factors create women’s higher levels of affective polarization: women are more likely to be partisans, strength in abortion attitudes, and partisanship has a more substantial influence on women’s attitudes compared to men’s attitudes. Breaking the analysis apart into three time periods: (1) gender gap emergence 1980 to 1988, (2) elite polarization 1990 to 1998, and (3) hyper-partisanship 2000 to 2016 reinforces that partisan strength is central to understanding affective polarization. Additionally, during the 1990s when elite polarization is intensifying the strength of issue attitudes and ideology.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 282-292 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Politics Research (Volume 49, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2020
  • Published - 05/2021

Publication status

Published - 05/2021

ISSN

1532-673X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85096217954

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
6.38
SciVal
Author count
2
SciVal
Paper percentile
96
SciVal
citations
2
SciVal
Top percentile
5
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.50
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
52
Mentions
3
Citation count
45
Social media
10