A comparative safety review of targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukemia

Mark Dalgetty, Christian Leurinda, Jorge Cortes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment has primarily focused on 7 + 3 chemotherapy, but in the last decade there has been a significant increase in new therapies, mostly targeted agents, approved for the treatment of AML. We performed a comparative analysis of the unique safety profile of each of these new agents. Areas covered: We conducted a review of the current literature on public databases (PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration) regarding new AML drugs that were approved from 2017 to 2023. Expert opinion: The diagnosis of AML typically carries a poor prognosis but with an increase in the number of drugs that are now available, patients’ outcomes are improving. With novel mechanisms of action, the use of these agents introduces different safety profiles, occasionally with adverse events not previously seen with standard chemotherapy or at different frequencies. An understanding of the drugs available and the safety concerns associated with each one is crucial to selecting the best available option for each patient, and early recognition and appropriate management of drug-related adverse effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1225-1236
Number of pages12
JournalExpert Opinion on Drug Safety
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Acute myeloid leukemia
  • CPX-351
  • FLT3 inhibitor
  • Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
  • Glasdegib
  • IDH inhibitor
  • Venetoclax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative safety review of targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this