TY - JOUR
T1 - Animal bites to the head and neck
AU - Kountakis, Stilianos E.
AU - Chamblee, Socorro A.
AU - Maillard, Alberto A.J.
AU - Stiernberg, Charles M.
PY - 1998/3
Y1 - 1998/3
N2 - There is controversy regarding the timing of repair and the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with animal bites to the head and neck. In this paper we review our experience with such wounds, and address surgical management and the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A retrospective review of the medical records of 29 patients with animal bites to the head and neck was conducted. All patients were seen and treated at a large teaching hospital in Houston, Texas over an 18-month period. Seventy-six percent of our patients were 12 years old or younger. Most came to the emergency room soon after sustaining their injuries, and their wounds were repaired primarily with favorable results. There were no cases of wound infection. Ninety percent were treated with prophylactic antibiotics. The wounds of the 10% of patients who did receive antibiotics were similar to those of the other patients and healed well without infection. Wounds resulting from animal bites to the head and neck can be repaired primarily when treated shortly after injury. Further prospective, randomized studies are recommended to evaluate the effectiveness and necessity of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in this patient population.
AB - There is controversy regarding the timing of repair and the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with animal bites to the head and neck. In this paper we review our experience with such wounds, and address surgical management and the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A retrospective review of the medical records of 29 patients with animal bites to the head and neck was conducted. All patients were seen and treated at a large teaching hospital in Houston, Texas over an 18-month period. Seventy-six percent of our patients were 12 years old or younger. Most came to the emergency room soon after sustaining their injuries, and their wounds were repaired primarily with favorable results. There were no cases of wound infection. Ninety percent were treated with prophylactic antibiotics. The wounds of the 10% of patients who did receive antibiotics were similar to those of the other patients and healed well without infection. Wounds resulting from animal bites to the head and neck can be repaired primarily when treated shortly after injury. Further prospective, randomized studies are recommended to evaluate the effectiveness and necessity of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in this patient population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031893054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031893054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/014556139807700312
DO - 10.1177/014556139807700312
M3 - Article
C2 - 9557412
AN - SCOPUS:0031893054
SN - 0145-5613
VL - 77
SP - 216
EP - 220
JO - Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly
JF - Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly
IS - 3
ER -