TY - JOUR
T1 - Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?
AU - Mackert, John Rodway
AU - Wahl, Michael J.
PY - 2004/7
Y1 - 2004/7
N2 - Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.
AB - Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7944228333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7944228333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15468542
AN - SCOPUS:7944228333
SN - 1043-2256
VL - 32
SP - 601
EP - 610
JO - CDA journal California Dental Association
JF - CDA journal California Dental Association
IS - 7
ER -