TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin
AU - Nakajima, Masatoshi
AU - Kanemura, Nobuharu
AU - Pereira, Patricia N.R.
AU - Tagami, Junji
AU - Pashley, David H.
PY - 2000/12
Y1 - 2000/12
N2 - Purpose: To compare bond strengths of resins to acid-etched wet vs. dry dentin. Materials and Methods: Human third molars were bonded with One-Step (OS), Single Bond (SB) or Clearfil PhotoBond (PB) under control moist or air-dried (5 s air blast) conditions. Tensile bond strengths were tested using the microtensile bond testing method. Scanning electron microscopy was done to evaluate the quality and thickness of the hybrid layers following polishing and acid plus NaOCl-challenge. Results: The tensile bond strengths of OS, SB and PB were significantly (P< 0.01) lower (8-19 MPa) to air-dried dentin than to moist dentin (39-50 MPa). No hybrid layers were seen in the air-dried specimens bonded with OS or SB, while relatively thin hybrid layers were produced by PB. In contrast, moist dentin produced high bond strengths with all bonding systems and created thicker, acid/NaOCl-resistant hybrid layers. These results support the predictions of a previously published morphologic model and offer a morphologic explanation for the differences in bond strengths between wet vs. dry bonds.
AB - Purpose: To compare bond strengths of resins to acid-etched wet vs. dry dentin. Materials and Methods: Human third molars were bonded with One-Step (OS), Single Bond (SB) or Clearfil PhotoBond (PB) under control moist or air-dried (5 s air blast) conditions. Tensile bond strengths were tested using the microtensile bond testing method. Scanning electron microscopy was done to evaluate the quality and thickness of the hybrid layers following polishing and acid plus NaOCl-challenge. Results: The tensile bond strengths of OS, SB and PB were significantly (P< 0.01) lower (8-19 MPa) to air-dried dentin than to moist dentin (39-50 MPa). No hybrid layers were seen in the air-dried specimens bonded with OS or SB, while relatively thin hybrid layers were produced by PB. In contrast, moist dentin produced high bond strengths with all bonding systems and created thicker, acid/NaOCl-resistant hybrid layers. These results support the predictions of a previously published morphologic model and offer a morphologic explanation for the differences in bond strengths between wet vs. dry bonds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034575171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034575171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11764127
AN - SCOPUS:0034575171
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 13
SP - 324
EP - 328
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 6
ER -