TY - JOUR
T1 - Computer-assisted assessment of the fetal biophysical profile
AU - Devoe, Lawrence D.
AU - Searle, Nancy
AU - Searle, John
AU - Phillips, Mary
AU - Castillo, Ramon A.
AU - Saad, Samy
AU - Sherline, Donald M.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1985
Y1 - 1985
N2 - The biophysical profile assesses (1) fetal heart rate, (2) breathing movements, (3) fetal body movements, (4) amniotic fluid volume, and (5) fetal tone. In the past, these data have been scored by an arbitrary, unweighted system. While this approach is useful in detecting major anomalies and oligohydramnios, both static observations, the dynamic variables (fetal heart rate, fetal breathing movements, and fetal body movements) have added little information beyond that of an extended nonstress test alone. We have evaluated an alternative biophysical assessment system, modeled after extended physiologic studies, which not only acquires dynamic fetal variables simultaneously but, with computer assistance, quantifies the biophysical information. With an ADR 4000/L- scanner, a Hewlett-Packard 8040 A monitor, and a specially programmed IBM microcomputer, we studied 100 normal term fetuses during 60-minute epochs. Each gestation had normal amniotic fluid volume and fetal tone. Normative values for the dynamic variables, expressed as means ± SD were: (1) fetal heart rate, 137 ± 6.3 bpm; (2) incidence of fetal breathing movements, 25.0% ± 17.3%; (3) rate of fetal breathing movements, 46.0 ± 9.4 breaths/min; (4) total fetal breathing movements, 823 ± 61; (5) incidence of fetal body movements, 8.5% ± 3.9%; (6) accelerations (>15 bpm, 15 seconds), 14.1 ± 6.3. We conclude that this approach is practicable, respects the biologic cycles of fetal behavior, and provides a basis for population standards and sequential study of the same fetus.
AB - The biophysical profile assesses (1) fetal heart rate, (2) breathing movements, (3) fetal body movements, (4) amniotic fluid volume, and (5) fetal tone. In the past, these data have been scored by an arbitrary, unweighted system. While this approach is useful in detecting major anomalies and oligohydramnios, both static observations, the dynamic variables (fetal heart rate, fetal breathing movements, and fetal body movements) have added little information beyond that of an extended nonstress test alone. We have evaluated an alternative biophysical assessment system, modeled after extended physiologic studies, which not only acquires dynamic fetal variables simultaneously but, with computer assistance, quantifies the biophysical information. With an ADR 4000/L- scanner, a Hewlett-Packard 8040 A monitor, and a specially programmed IBM microcomputer, we studied 100 normal term fetuses during 60-minute epochs. Each gestation had normal amniotic fluid volume and fetal tone. Normative values for the dynamic variables, expressed as means ± SD were: (1) fetal heart rate, 137 ± 6.3 bpm; (2) incidence of fetal breathing movements, 25.0% ± 17.3%; (3) rate of fetal breathing movements, 46.0 ± 9.4 breaths/min; (4) total fetal breathing movements, 823 ± 61; (5) incidence of fetal body movements, 8.5% ± 3.9%; (6) accelerations (>15 bpm, 15 seconds), 14.1 ± 6.3. We conclude that this approach is practicable, respects the biologic cycles of fetal behavior, and provides a basis for population standards and sequential study of the same fetus.
KW - Fetus
KW - biophysical profile
KW - computer assistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022001010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022001010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9378(85)80123-X
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9378(85)80123-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 3901767
AN - SCOPUS:0022001010
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 153
SP - 317
EP - 321
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 3
ER -