TY - JOUR
T1 - How much can we rely on artificial intelligence chatbots such as the ChatGPT software program to assist with scientific writing?
AU - Dashti, Mahmood
AU - Londono, Jimmy
AU - Ghasemi, Shohreh
AU - Moghaddasi, Negar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Statement of Problem: Use of the ChatGPT software program by authors raises many questions, primarily regarding egregious issues such as plagiarism. Nevertheless, little is known about the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI) models can produce high-quality research publications and advance and shape the direction of a research topic. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine how well the ChatGPT software program, a writing tool powered by AI, could respond to questions about scientific or research writing and generate accurate references with academic examples. Material and methods: Questions were made for the ChatGPT software program to locate an abstract containing a particular keyword in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD). Then, whether the resulting articles existed or were published was determined. Questions were made for the algorithm 5 times to locate 5 JPD articles containing 2 specific keywords, bringing the total number of articles to 25. The process was repeated twice, each time with a different set of keywords, and the ChatGPT software program provided a total of 75 articles. The search was conducted at various times between April 1 and 4, 2023. Finally, 2 authors independently searched the JPD website and Google Scholar to determine whether the articles provided by the ChatGPT software program existed. Results: When the author tested the ChatGPT software program's ability to locate articles in the JPD and Google Scholar using a set of keywords, the results did not match the papers that the ChatGPT software program had generated with the help of the AI tool. Consequently, all 75 articles provided by the ChatGPT software program were not accurately located in the JPD or Google Scholar databases and had to be added manually to ensure the accuracy of the relevant references. Conclusions: Researchers and academic scholars must be cautious when using the ChatGPT software program because AI-generated content cannot provide or analyze the same information as an author or researcher. In addition, the results indicated that writing credit or references to such content or references in prestigious academic journals is not yet appropriate. At this time, scientific writing is only valid when performed manually by researchers.
AB - Statement of Problem: Use of the ChatGPT software program by authors raises many questions, primarily regarding egregious issues such as plagiarism. Nevertheless, little is known about the extent to which artificial intelligence (AI) models can produce high-quality research publications and advance and shape the direction of a research topic. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine how well the ChatGPT software program, a writing tool powered by AI, could respond to questions about scientific or research writing and generate accurate references with academic examples. Material and methods: Questions were made for the ChatGPT software program to locate an abstract containing a particular keyword in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD). Then, whether the resulting articles existed or were published was determined. Questions were made for the algorithm 5 times to locate 5 JPD articles containing 2 specific keywords, bringing the total number of articles to 25. The process was repeated twice, each time with a different set of keywords, and the ChatGPT software program provided a total of 75 articles. The search was conducted at various times between April 1 and 4, 2023. Finally, 2 authors independently searched the JPD website and Google Scholar to determine whether the articles provided by the ChatGPT software program existed. Results: When the author tested the ChatGPT software program's ability to locate articles in the JPD and Google Scholar using a set of keywords, the results did not match the papers that the ChatGPT software program had generated with the help of the AI tool. Consequently, all 75 articles provided by the ChatGPT software program were not accurately located in the JPD or Google Scholar databases and had to be added manually to ensure the accuracy of the relevant references. Conclusions: Researchers and academic scholars must be cautious when using the ChatGPT software program because AI-generated content cannot provide or analyze the same information as an author or researcher. In addition, the results indicated that writing credit or references to such content or references in prestigious academic journals is not yet appropriate. At this time, scientific writing is only valid when performed manually by researchers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164600654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164600654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.023
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164600654
SN - 0022-3913
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
ER -