TY - GEN
T1 - Integrating nursing classrooms with technology via audience response systems
T2 - 2nd International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technological Innovation, IMETI 2009
AU - Smith, Deborah A
AU - Rosenkoetter, Marlene
AU - Levitt, Donna
PY - 2009/1/1
Y1 - 2009/1/1
N2 - An audience response system (ARS) was used to integrate a nursing classroom with technology. ARS can both engage students and provide immediate feedback. Students (n=60) enrolled in an introductory professional nursing course at a Southeastern U.S. university evaluated ARS use for testing. Literature on ARS use in nursing education is limited, thus the need to determine nursing students' perceptions of the appropriateness of ARS for evaluation. Facilitation of testing and instruction are a few benefits of using ARS. A 4-point Likert perception scale (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) was distributed to students after all coursework for the semester was completed. Survey questions were projected on the screen and students clicked in their responses. On the perception scale, for Agree or Strongly Agree, 56 (94.9%) indicated they liked using the CPS for quizzes, 49 (85.9%) preferred CPS to written mid-term exams, 51 (87.9%) perceived it was a fair method of grading quizzes, 50 (96.2%) indicated a desire for greater use, and 51 (94.4%) recommend use of CPS to others. Younger, female students preferred (p<.05) use of CPS for quizzes, wished it were used by faculty in other courses and recommend use of CPS to other students. Younger students also preferred (p<.05) using CPS for quizzes rather than having a written midterm exam. Students who reported fewer years since high school completion preferred the use of CPS for written final exams. Overall entry error rate was .013 for six quizzes throughout the semester.
AB - An audience response system (ARS) was used to integrate a nursing classroom with technology. ARS can both engage students and provide immediate feedback. Students (n=60) enrolled in an introductory professional nursing course at a Southeastern U.S. university evaluated ARS use for testing. Literature on ARS use in nursing education is limited, thus the need to determine nursing students' perceptions of the appropriateness of ARS for evaluation. Facilitation of testing and instruction are a few benefits of using ARS. A 4-point Likert perception scale (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) was distributed to students after all coursework for the semester was completed. Survey questions were projected on the screen and students clicked in their responses. On the perception scale, for Agree or Strongly Agree, 56 (94.9%) indicated they liked using the CPS for quizzes, 49 (85.9%) preferred CPS to written mid-term exams, 51 (87.9%) perceived it was a fair method of grading quizzes, 50 (96.2%) indicated a desire for greater use, and 51 (94.4%) recommend use of CPS to others. Younger, female students preferred (p<.05) use of CPS for quizzes, wished it were used by faculty in other courses and recommend use of CPS to other students. Younger students also preferred (p<.05) using CPS for quizzes rather than having a written midterm exam. Students who reported fewer years since high school completion preferred the use of CPS for written final exams. Overall entry error rate was .013 for six quizzes throughout the semester.
KW - Audience response system
KW - Classroom participation system
KW - Clickers
KW - Nursing education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898464317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898464317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84898464317
SN - 193427268X
SN - 9781934272688
T3 - IMETI 2009 - 2nd International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technological Innovation, Proceedings
SP - 167
EP - 172
BT - IMETI 2009 - 2nd International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technological Innovation, Proceedings
PB - International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics, IIIC
Y2 - 10 July 2009 through 13 July 2009
ER -