It's about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice

Kevin P. Banks; Justin G. Peacock; Mariya Gusman; Michael N. Clemenshaw

doi:10.2214/AJR.19.22642

It's about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice

Kevin P. Banks, Justin G. Peacock, Mariya Gusman, Michael N. Clemenshaw

MCG-Radiology Nuclear Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	313-324
Number of pages	12
Journal	American Journal of Roentgenology
Volume	215
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22642
State	Published - Aug 2020

Keywords

FDG PET/CT
Qualitative assessment
Response assessment criteria
Treatment response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.2214/AJR.19.22642

Cite this

@article{7ddfdd608221408f97161dac0ff15c36,

title = "It's about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice",

abstract = "Objective FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.",

keywords = "FDG PET/CT, Qualitative assessment, Response assessment criteria, Treatment response",

author = "Banks, {Kevin P.} and Peacock, {Justin G.} and Mariya Gusman and Clemenshaw, {Michael N.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 American Roentgen Ray Society.",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

doi = "10.2214/AJR.19.22642",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "215",

pages = "313--324",

journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",

issn = "0361-803X",

publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's about quality, not quantity

T2 - Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice

AU - Banks, Kevin P.

AU - Peacock, Justin G.

AU - Gusman, Mariya

AU - Clemenshaw, Michael N.

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

N2 - Objective FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.

AB - Objective FDG PET/CT has emerged as an effective tool for the timely accurate assessment of how tumors respond to therapy. To standardize interpretation and reporting, numerous response criteria have been developed. This article will review the evolution of these criteria along with their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Several qualitative assessments applicable to common malignancies have been developed in recent years that solve many of the challenges faced by their quantitative predecessors. These are reviewed, and information is provided regarding individual treatment efficacy and prognosis.

KW - FDG PET/CT

KW - Qualitative assessment

KW - Response assessment criteria

KW - Treatment response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089161298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089161298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.19.22642

DO - 10.2214/AJR.19.22642

M3 - Review article

C2 - 32551905

AN - SCOPUS:85089161298

SN - 0361-803X

VL - 215

SP - 313

EP - 324

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

IS - 2

ER -

It's about quality, not quantity: Qualitative FDG PET/CT criteria for therapy response assessment in clinical practice

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this