Multicomponent interventions to enhance influenza vaccine delivery to adolescents

Lisa M. Gargano; Karen Pazol; Jessica M. Sales; Julia E. Painter; Christopher Morfaw; La Dawna M. Jones; Paul Weiss; James W. Buehler; Dennis L. Murray; Gina M. Wingood; Walter A. Orenstein; Ralph J. DiClemente; James M. Hughes

doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0453

Multicomponent interventions to enhance influenza vaccine delivery to adolescents

Lisa M. Gargano, Karen Pazol, Jessica M. Sales, Julia E. Painter, Christopher Morfaw, La Dawna M. Jones, Paul Weiss, James W. Buehler, Dennis L. Murray, Gina M. Wingood, Walter A. Orenstein, Ralph J. DiClemente, James M. Hughes

Pediatrics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare school- versus provider-based approaches to improving influenza vaccination coverage among adolescents in rural Georgia. METHODS: We used a nonrandomized, 3-armed design: (1) a middle-and high school-based influenza vaccination intervention in 1 county; (2) a provider-based influenza vaccination intervention in a second county; and (3) a standard-of-care condition in a third county. Interventions also included distribution of an educational brochure, school presentations, and community-based outreach to enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness among adolescents and their parents. RESULTS: During the 2008-2009 influenza season, 70 (19%) of 370 students were vaccinated in the school-based county and 110 (15%) of 736 students were vaccinated in the provider-based county, compared with 71 (8%) of 889 students in the standard-of-care county (risk ratio [RR] _school: 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.2]; RR _provider: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4 -2.5]). During 2009 -2010, seasonal influenza vaccination coverage was 114 (30.4%) of 375 of students in the school-based county, 122 (16.9%) of 663 of students in the provider-based county, and 131 (15.2%) of 861 students in the standard-of-care county (RR _school: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.9 -2.9]; RR _provider: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.97-1.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Special efforts to promote influenza vaccination among rural, predominantly black students were associated with increased vaccination coverage. The school-based influenza vaccination intervention was associated with the highest levels of vaccination coverage. This study revealed the efficacy of school-based influenza education to improve vaccination rates among adolescents.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	e1092-e1099
Journal	Pediatrics
Volume	128
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0453
State	Published - Nov 2011

Keywords

Adolescents
Influenza vaccine
Pandemic preparedness
School-based clinics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1542/peds.2011-0453

Cite this

@article{7ab0d5f6a8a646839693353c8a9dec50,

title = "Multicomponent interventions to enhance influenza vaccine delivery to adolescents",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare school- versus provider-based approaches to improving influenza vaccination coverage among adolescents in rural Georgia. METHODS: We used a nonrandomized, 3-armed design: (1) a middle-and high school-based influenza vaccination intervention in 1 county; (2) a provider-based influenza vaccination intervention in a second county; and (3) a standard-of-care condition in a third county. Interventions also included distribution of an educational brochure, school presentations, and community-based outreach to enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness among adolescents and their parents. RESULTS: During the 2008-2009 influenza season, 70 (19%) of 370 students were vaccinated in the school-based county and 110 (15%) of 736 students were vaccinated in the provider-based county, compared with 71 (8%) of 889 students in the standard-of-care county (risk ratio [RR] school: 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.2]; RR provider: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4 -2.5]). During 2009 -2010, seasonal influenza vaccination coverage was 114 (30.4%) of 375 of students in the school-based county, 122 (16.9%) of 663 of students in the provider-based county, and 131 (15.2%) of 861 students in the standard-of-care county (RR school: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.9 -2.9]; RR provider: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.97-1.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Special efforts to promote influenza vaccination among rural, predominantly black students were associated with increased vaccination coverage. The school-based influenza vaccination intervention was associated with the highest levels of vaccination coverage. This study revealed the efficacy of school-based influenza education to improve vaccination rates among adolescents.",

keywords = "Adolescents, Influenza vaccine, Pandemic preparedness, School-based clinics",

author = "Gargano, {Lisa M.} and Karen Pazol and Sales, {Jessica M.} and Painter, {Julia E.} and Christopher Morfaw and Jones, {La Dawna M.} and Paul Weiss and Buehler, {James W.} and Murray, {Dennis L.} and Wingood, {Gina M.} and Orenstein, {Walter A.} and DiClemente, {Ralph J.} and Hughes, {James M.}",

year = "2011",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1542/peds.2011-0453",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "128",

pages = "e1092--e1099",

journal = "Pediatrics",

issn = "0031-4005",

publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicomponent interventions to enhance influenza vaccine delivery to adolescents

AU - Gargano, Lisa M.

AU - Pazol, Karen

AU - Sales, Jessica M.

AU - Painter, Julia E.

AU - Morfaw, Christopher

AU - Jones, La Dawna M.

AU - Weiss, Paul

AU - Buehler, James W.

AU - Murray, Dennis L.

AU - Wingood, Gina M.

AU - Orenstein, Walter A.

AU - DiClemente, Ralph J.

AU - Hughes, James M.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare school- versus provider-based approaches to improving influenza vaccination coverage among adolescents in rural Georgia. METHODS: We used a nonrandomized, 3-armed design: (1) a middle-and high school-based influenza vaccination intervention in 1 county; (2) a provider-based influenza vaccination intervention in a second county; and (3) a standard-of-care condition in a third county. Interventions also included distribution of an educational brochure, school presentations, and community-based outreach to enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness among adolescents and their parents. RESULTS: During the 2008-2009 influenza season, 70 (19%) of 370 students were vaccinated in the school-based county and 110 (15%) of 736 students were vaccinated in the provider-based county, compared with 71 (8%) of 889 students in the standard-of-care county (risk ratio [RR] school: 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.2]; RR provider: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4 -2.5]). During 2009 -2010, seasonal influenza vaccination coverage was 114 (30.4%) of 375 of students in the school-based county, 122 (16.9%) of 663 of students in the provider-based county, and 131 (15.2%) of 861 students in the standard-of-care county (RR school: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.9 -2.9]; RR provider: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.97-1.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Special efforts to promote influenza vaccination among rural, predominantly black students were associated with increased vaccination coverage. The school-based influenza vaccination intervention was associated with the highest levels of vaccination coverage. This study revealed the efficacy of school-based influenza education to improve vaccination rates among adolescents.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare school- versus provider-based approaches to improving influenza vaccination coverage among adolescents in rural Georgia. METHODS: We used a nonrandomized, 3-armed design: (1) a middle-and high school-based influenza vaccination intervention in 1 county; (2) a provider-based influenza vaccination intervention in a second county; and (3) a standard-of-care condition in a third county. Interventions also included distribution of an educational brochure, school presentations, and community-based outreach to enhance vaccine knowledge and awareness among adolescents and their parents. RESULTS: During the 2008-2009 influenza season, 70 (19%) of 370 students were vaccinated in the school-based county and 110 (15%) of 736 students were vaccinated in the provider-based county, compared with 71 (8%) of 889 students in the standard-of-care county (risk ratio [RR] school: 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.2]; RR provider: 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4 -2.5]). During 2009 -2010, seasonal influenza vaccination coverage was 114 (30.4%) of 375 of students in the school-based county, 122 (16.9%) of 663 of students in the provider-based county, and 131 (15.2%) of 861 students in the standard-of-care county (RR school: 2.3 [95% CI: 1.9 -2.9]; RR provider: 1.2 [95% CI: 0.97-1.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Special efforts to promote influenza vaccination among rural, predominantly black students were associated with increased vaccination coverage. The school-based influenza vaccination intervention was associated with the highest levels of vaccination coverage. This study revealed the efficacy of school-based influenza education to improve vaccination rates among adolescents.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Influenza vaccine

KW - Pandemic preparedness

KW - School-based clinics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80355129559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80355129559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2011-0453

DO - 10.1542/peds.2011-0453

M3 - Article

C2 - 21987709

AN - SCOPUS:80355129559

SN - 0031-4005

VL - 128

SP - e1092-e1099

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

IS - 5

ER -

Multicomponent interventions to enhance influenza vaccine delivery to adolescents

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this