TY - JOUR
T1 - Salvage Therapy Outcomes in a Historical Cohort of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
AU - Ravandi, Farhad
AU - Pierce, Sherry
AU - Garcia-Manero, Guillermo
AU - Kadia, Tapan
AU - Jabbour, Elias
AU - Borthakur, Gautam
AU - DiNardo, Courtney D.
AU - Daver, Naval
AU - Short, Nicholas J.
AU - Alvarado, Yesid
AU - Cortes, Jorge
AU - Kim, Christopher
AU - Kelsh, Michael
AU - Katz, Aaron
AU - Williams, Richard
AU - Yang, Zhao
AU - Mehta, Bhakti
AU - Kantarjian, Hagop
N1 - Funding Information:
F.R. discloses the following: Sunesis: honoraria; Jazz: honoraria; Macrogenix: honoraria, research funding; AbbVie: research funding; Orsenix: honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: research funding; Seattle Genetics: research funding; Xencor: research funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: consultancy, honoraria; Amgen: honoraria, research funding, speakers bureau. T.K. discloses the following: Pfizer: consultancy, research funding; Amgen: consultancy, research funding; BMS: research funding; AbbVie: consultancy; Takeda: consultancy; Novartis: consultancy; Jazz: consultancy, research funding; Celgene: research funding; C.D.D. discloses the following: Celgene: honoraria; AbbVie: honoraria; Bayer: honoraria; Agios: consultancy; Medimmune: honoraria; Karyopharm: honoraria. N.D. discloses the following: Pfizer: consultancy; Novartis: research funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: research funding; Karyopharm: consultancy; ARIAD: research funding; Pfizer: research funding; Kiromic: research funding; Sunesis: research funding; Karyopharm: research funding; ImmunoGen: consultancy; BMS: research funding; Novartis: consultancy; Incyte: consultancy; Sunesis: consultancy; Alexion: consultancy; Otsuka: consultancy; Incyte: research funding. N.J.S. discloses the following: Takeda Oncology: consultancy. J.C. discloses the following: Daiichi Sankyo: consultancy, research funding; Pfizer: consultancy, research funding; Astellas Pharma: consultancy, research funding; Arog: research funding; Novartis: consultancy, research funding. C.K. discloses the following: Amgen: employment, equity ownership. M.K. discloses the following: Amgen: employment, equity ownership. A.K. discloses the following: Amgen: other: former employee and stockholder; Kite, a Gilead Company: consultancy. Z.Y. discloses the following: Amgen: employment, equity ownership. B.M. discloses the following: Amgen: employment, equity ownership. The other authors have stated that they have no conflict of interest.Funded by Amgen Inc. The authors wish to thank James Ziobro (funded by Amgen) for providing medical writing assistance.
Funding Information:
Funded by Amgen Inc . The authors wish to thank James Ziobro (funded by Amgen ) for providing medical writing assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Background: The prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor, with no universal standard salvage therapy currently available for most patients. Novel therapies with efficacy in patient subsets often have limited activity in alternative subsets, resulting in a majority of patients not gaining benefit from these therapies. This study systematically evaluated patient outcomes in a large cohort of R/R AML patients from a single institution across all salvage therapy lines, up to and including the third line. Patients and Methods: Outcomes of R/R AML patients treated at a single institution (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) between 2002 and 2016 were entered into a central database. Eligible patients received one or more lines of salvage therapy after first occurrence of R/R AML. Patients who received second- or third-line salvage treatment were also included in the first salvage analysis. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old at time of initial AML diagnosis, with no central nervous system involvement. Results: A total of 818 eligible patients received one or more lines of salvage therapy, 809 received second-line salvage therapy, and 397 received third-line salvage therapy. Complete remission rates decreased from 14% after first salvage therapy to 9% after second salvage therapy and 3% after third salvage therapy. Median overall survival was 6.30, 4.07, and 2.98 months after first, second, and third salvage therapies, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that the best chance of obtaining long-term remission in AML is with a successful first induction. Strategies that improve initial response and decrease the likelihood of relapse should be pursued. We examined the outcomes of 818 adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2016. Complete remission rates decreased from 14% after first salvage, to 9% after second salvage, and 3% after third salvage treatment. Strategies that improve initial response and decrease the likelihood of relapse are needed to obtain long-term remission for AML.
AB - Background: The prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor, with no universal standard salvage therapy currently available for most patients. Novel therapies with efficacy in patient subsets often have limited activity in alternative subsets, resulting in a majority of patients not gaining benefit from these therapies. This study systematically evaluated patient outcomes in a large cohort of R/R AML patients from a single institution across all salvage therapy lines, up to and including the third line. Patients and Methods: Outcomes of R/R AML patients treated at a single institution (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) between 2002 and 2016 were entered into a central database. Eligible patients received one or more lines of salvage therapy after first occurrence of R/R AML. Patients who received second- or third-line salvage treatment were also included in the first salvage analysis. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old at time of initial AML diagnosis, with no central nervous system involvement. Results: A total of 818 eligible patients received one or more lines of salvage therapy, 809 received second-line salvage therapy, and 397 received third-line salvage therapy. Complete remission rates decreased from 14% after first salvage therapy to 9% after second salvage therapy and 3% after third salvage therapy. Median overall survival was 6.30, 4.07, and 2.98 months after first, second, and third salvage therapies, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that the best chance of obtaining long-term remission in AML is with a successful first induction. Strategies that improve initial response and decrease the likelihood of relapse should be pursued. We examined the outcomes of 818 adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2002 and 2016. Complete remission rates decreased from 14% after first salvage, to 9% after second salvage, and 3% after third salvage treatment. Strategies that improve initial response and decrease the likelihood of relapse are needed to obtain long-term remission for AML.
KW - Acute myeloid leukemia
KW - Outcomes
KW - Refractory
KW - Relapse
KW - Salvage therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089293803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089293803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clml.2020.06.007
DO - 10.1016/j.clml.2020.06.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 32792304
AN - SCOPUS:85089293803
SN - 2152-2650
VL - 20
SP - e871-e882
JO - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
JF - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
IS - 11
ER -