TY - JOUR
T1 - Single flap approach with and without guided tissue regeneration and a hydroxyapatite biomaterial in the management of intraosseous periodontal defects
AU - Trombelli, Leonardo
AU - Simonelli, Anna
AU - Pramstraller, Mattia
AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E
AU - Farina, Roberto
PY - 2010/9
Y1 - 2010/9
N2 - Background: The single flap approach (SFA) is aminimallyinvasive procedure designed for periodontal reconstructive procedures of intraosseous periodontal defects characterized bya dominant unilateral, buccal or oral, extension. This study evaluates the adjunctive effect of guided tissue regeneration(GTR) combined with a hydroxyapatite (HA) biomaterial in the management of intraosseous periodontal defects accessed with SFA compared to SFA alone. Methods: Twenty-four intraosseous defects (in 24 patients) were randomly allocated to treatmentwith SFA or SFA + HA/GTR. Clinical outcomes were assessed6 months postsurgery. Results: Five sites in the SFA + HA/GTRgroup showed incomplete closure at week 2, which resolved spontaneously. There were no statistically significant or clinicallymeaningful differences in mean (±SD) clinical attachment gain (4.7 ± 2.5 versus 4.4 ± 1.5 mm), probing depth reduction (5.3 ± 2.4 versus 5.3 ± 1.5 mm), and gingival recession increase (0.4 ± 1.4 versus 0.8 ± 0.8 mm) between the SFA + HA/GTR and SFA groups.Conclusions: SFA with and without HA/GTR seems to be a valuable minimally invasive approach in the treatment of deep intraosseous periodontal defects. Under the present experimental conditions, the additional HA/GTR protocol offers no significant adjunctive effect.
AB - Background: The single flap approach (SFA) is aminimallyinvasive procedure designed for periodontal reconstructive procedures of intraosseous periodontal defects characterized bya dominant unilateral, buccal or oral, extension. This study evaluates the adjunctive effect of guided tissue regeneration(GTR) combined with a hydroxyapatite (HA) biomaterial in the management of intraosseous periodontal defects accessed with SFA compared to SFA alone. Methods: Twenty-four intraosseous defects (in 24 patients) were randomly allocated to treatmentwith SFA or SFA + HA/GTR. Clinical outcomes were assessed6 months postsurgery. Results: Five sites in the SFA + HA/GTRgroup showed incomplete closure at week 2, which resolved spontaneously. There were no statistically significant or clinicallymeaningful differences in mean (±SD) clinical attachment gain (4.7 ± 2.5 versus 4.4 ± 1.5 mm), probing depth reduction (5.3 ± 2.4 versus 5.3 ± 1.5 mm), and gingival recession increase (0.4 ± 1.4 versus 0.8 ± 0.8 mm) between the SFA + HA/GTR and SFA groups.Conclusions: SFA with and without HA/GTR seems to be a valuable minimally invasive approach in the treatment of deep intraosseous periodontal defects. Under the present experimental conditions, the additional HA/GTR protocol offers no significant adjunctive effect.
KW - Alveolar bone loss
KW - Periodontitis
KW - Reconstructive surgical procedures
KW - Surgical flaps
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956600206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956600206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1902/jop.2010.100113
DO - 10.1902/jop.2010.100113
M3 - Article
C2 - 20528696
AN - SCOPUS:77956600206
SN - 0022-3492
VL - 81
SP - 1256
EP - 1263
JO - Journal of periodontology
JF - Journal of periodontology
IS - 9
ER -