TY - JOUR
T1 - The Emergency Medicine Physician Workforce
T2 - Projections for 2030
AU - Marco, Catherine A.
AU - Courtney, D. Mark
AU - Ling, Louis J.
AU - Salsberg, Edward
AU - Reisdorff, Earl J.
AU - Gallahue, Fiona E.
AU - Suter, Robert E.
AU - Muelleman, Robert
AU - Chappell, Bradley
AU - Evans, Dian Dowling
AU - Vafaie, Nathan
AU - Richwine, Chelsea
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org ). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. ES and CR received funding from the American College of Emergency Physicians, American Board of Emergency Medicine, American College of Osteopathic Emergency Physicians, American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine, Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors, Emergency Medicine Residents’ Association, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine for the data acquisition and analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Study objective: The goals of this study were to determine the current and projected supply in 2030 of contributors to emergency care, including emergency residency-trained and board-certified physicians, other physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. In addition, this study was designed to determine the current and projected demand for residency-trained, board-certified emergency physicians. Methods: To forecast future workforce supply and demand, sources of existing data were used, assumptions based on past and potential future trends were determined, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine how the final forecast would be subject to variance in the baseline inputs and assumptions. Methods included: (1) estimates of the baseline workforce supply of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants; (2) estimates of future changes in the raw numbers of persons entering and leaving that workforce; (3) estimates of the productivity of the workforce; and (4) estimates of the demand for emergency care services. The methodology assumes supply equals demand in the base year and estimates the change between the base year and 2030; it then compares supply and demand in 2030 under different scenarios. Results: The task force consensus was that the most likely future scenario is described by: 2% annual graduate medical education growth, 3% annual emergency physician attrition, 20% encounters seen by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, and 11% increase in emergency department visits relative to 2018. This scenario would result in a surplus of 7,845 emergency physicians in 2030. Conclusion: The specialty of emergency medicine is facing the likely oversupply of emergency physicians in 2030. The factors leading to this include the increasing supply of and changing demand for emergency physicians. An organized, collective approach to a balanced workforce by the specialty of emergency medicine is imperative.
AB - Study objective: The goals of this study were to determine the current and projected supply in 2030 of contributors to emergency care, including emergency residency-trained and board-certified physicians, other physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. In addition, this study was designed to determine the current and projected demand for residency-trained, board-certified emergency physicians. Methods: To forecast future workforce supply and demand, sources of existing data were used, assumptions based on past and potential future trends were determined, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine how the final forecast would be subject to variance in the baseline inputs and assumptions. Methods included: (1) estimates of the baseline workforce supply of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants; (2) estimates of future changes in the raw numbers of persons entering and leaving that workforce; (3) estimates of the productivity of the workforce; and (4) estimates of the demand for emergency care services. The methodology assumes supply equals demand in the base year and estimates the change between the base year and 2030; it then compares supply and demand in 2030 under different scenarios. Results: The task force consensus was that the most likely future scenario is described by: 2% annual graduate medical education growth, 3% annual emergency physician attrition, 20% encounters seen by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, and 11% increase in emergency department visits relative to 2018. This scenario would result in a surplus of 7,845 emergency physicians in 2030. Conclusion: The specialty of emergency medicine is facing the likely oversupply of emergency physicians in 2030. The factors leading to this include the increasing supply of and changing demand for emergency physicians. An organized, collective approach to a balanced workforce by the specialty of emergency medicine is imperative.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111814907&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111814907&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.029
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 34353653
AN - SCOPUS:85111814907
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 78
SP - 726
EP - 737
JO - Annals of emergency medicine
JF - Annals of emergency medicine
IS - 6
ER -