Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Peripheral nerve stimulation in pain management: A systematic review

  • Jijun Xu(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Jiang Wu
    ,
  • Maunak Rana
    ,
  • Joshua Garza
    ,
  • Alyssa C. Zhu
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
    ,
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Washington
    ,
  • The University of Chicago
    ,
  • University of California at San Diego
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Research
Peer-review

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been increasingly used to manage acute and chronic pain. However, the level of clinical evidence to support its use is not clear. Objectives: To assess the clinical evidence of PNS in the treatment of acute or chronic pain. Study Design: A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of PNS in managing acute or chronic pain. Methods: Data sources were PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, and reference lists. The literature search was performed up to December 2019. Study selection included randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports of PNS in acute or chronic pain. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed utilizing Cochrane review methodologic quality assessment and Interventional Pain Management Techniques–Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) and Interventional Pain Management Techniques–Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR). The evidence was summarized utilizing principles of best evidence synthesis on a scale of 1 to 5. Data syntheses: 227 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. Results: Evidence synthesis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies showed Level I and II evidence of PNS in chronic migraine headache; Level II evidence in cluster headache, postamputation pain, chronic pelvic pain, chronic low back and lower extremity pain; and Level IV evidence in peripheral neuropathic pain, and postsurgical pain. Peripheral field stimulation has Level II evidence in chronic low back pain, and Level IV evidence in cranial pain. Limitations: Lack of high-quality RCTs. Meta-analysis was not possible due to wide variations in experimental design, research protocol, and heterogeneity of study population. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review suggest that PNS may be effective in managing chronic headaches, postamputation pain, chronic pelvic pain, and chronic low back and lower extremity pain, with variable levels of evidence in favor of this technique.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages E131-E152

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Pain Physician (Volume 24, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2021

Publication status

Published - 2021

ISSN

1533-3159

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85103231991
  • PubMed: 33740342

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.08
Fractional count
11
Fractional count
0.92
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX

Citation count
93
Social media
35

Funding Details

Address Correspondence: Jijun Xu, MD, PhD Department of Pain Management and Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic 9500 Euclid Ave Cleveland, OH 44195 E-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: Jijun Xu is supported by the MENTR program at Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, and a National Institutes of Health grant K08CA228039.
FundersFunding number
NIH
-
NCI
K08CA228039
Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, NB30, 9500 Euclid Avenue
-